Visible vs. UV-A false-colour
Continue reading Photographs of flowers: VIS vs. UV-A
Rather recently Vishay announced a miniature sensor under the name VEML6075 with two channels centred at . It is not just a sensor but it has all the electronics for temperature compensation and for converting the analogue signal from the sensor into digital data with a rough calibration applied. The package of this sensor is 1 mm thick and 2 mm times 1.25 mm in area. The sensor itself is much smaller and it follows reasonably well the cosine law without any diffuser. Price? Less than 2€… and between 4 and 7 € for a breakout board.
I haven’t tested it yet as a sensor. However, today I was testing a macro lens and I took a pair of photographs at rather high magnification, and as it fits a UV sensor, I photographed it both in visible and in UV-A radiation.
The whole image is 3 mm tall by 4 mm wide. It is slightly cropped from the full frame. Light source Convoy 2+ 365nm UV-A flashlight filtered with a visible blocking filter. Filter on objective zwb1 2mm thick, objective Zuiko 38mm f:3.5 macro (Olympus OM-System ca. 1973-1975+, single coated early version).
The “Ultimate Lens Hood” seems like a good tool. It is still to be seen if it is stiff enough and/or a bit sticky so as to easily stay in place on the glass surface. It has the potential for being very useful but how easy it will be to handle with different lenses is still to be seen.
I just made my pledge for one ULH at Kickstarter. If you want to get your own, be aware that the campaign is about to end.
See my earlier post to learn how I have been managing until now with normal collapsible lens hoods made of rubber. I recently uploaded a gallery of photos from an ongoing project where I am taking photographs through train windows.
I have updated the post ‘Black anodised aluminium in IR‘ after using the Tenenal special camera paint (black deep mat) and repeating some of the tests.
We are having stormy weather today, after a long warm and dry spell.
Aputure’s Amaran AL-M9 and Sunway Foto’s FL-96 are very small and handy LED light sources. The Amaran AL-M9 has been relegated to a second place in Aputure’s catalogue by the Amaran AL-MX, but I haven’t bought this newer and three times as expensive version. Both light sources compared here are roughly within the same price range.
A comparison between the Baader U filter and the StraightedgeU filter, both with sun and a modified flash as light sources. Examples of flowers from two species, which display different false-colours with the two filters. Continue reading Filters for UV photography
Using the E-M1 converted to full spectrum with the Pinhole Pro objectives is possible. Using a 58 mm NIR filter (Hoya R72) attached to the front of the 11 mm Pinhole Pro S11 worked fine, with no increase in vignetting. Using the StraightEdgeU 52 mm or Baader U-filter 2″ with a step-down ring blocked the corners of the image completely. The original 26 mm Pinhole Pro suffers a lot less from vignetting and can be used with these filters of smaller diameter than the front thread of the lens without problem.
Pinholes need to be very small to provide a useful image. Consequently the corresponding f-values are small, in most cases f:100 or smaller. This results in either very long exposures, or requires the use of very high ISO values. As we will see in the example images this is less of a problem than what could be expected because as the resolution of the pinhole is low, the images tolerate very strong noise reduction processing without losing there character or mood.
I have been testing some objectives for their UV transmission using LEDs as sources of radiation. I developed a protocol for such tests. Although used in this example to measure the spectral sensitivity of a camera sensor, the protocol can be easily adapted for the measurements of biological action spectra.